| 
							  
							It can 
							immediately be seen from this letter than David 
							Thomas was very poorly educated in English, and it 
							was almost certainly not his first language. 
							However, beyond his liberal use of capital letters 
							and almost non-existent spelling and punctuation, it 
							is clear that he was a very loving man, who cared 
							deeply for both Evelyn and Herbert. On more than one 
							occasion, he speaks very fondly of Herbert, and 
							seems proud of the education he is receiving. 
							  
							David's 
							underlining of the word "God" each time he uses it 
							could be an indication that he had a pious 
							upbringing, although he does not use the form "G-d", 
							as many pious Jews do today, to avoid perceived 
							inappropriate use of Hashem's Name. 
							  
							David 
							refers to Herbert as his nephew's son, and Morris 
							Kowalski as his nephew. Morris' parents are believed 
							to have been Dawid Szloma Kowalski (1864-1930) and 
							Szejna Gitl Tobiaszora (1864-1925). As Dawid's 
							brothers are known, it could be that David was a 
							brother of Gitl's, born under the surname Tobiaszora. 
							Certainly, Thomas is a plausible anglicisation of 
							Tobiaszora. There is a David Thomas listed on the 
							1930 census in Brooklyn aged 55, who arrived in the 
							US in 1905, who could be a candidate for this David 
							S Thomas. His age implies a birth year of 1874/5, 
							which is consistent with his being Gitl's brother, 
							and certainly within his mother's fertile years. If 
							this David is the author of this letter, he would be 
							around 70 years old at the time he wrote it, which 
							is consistent with his mention of his and his wife's 
							health and recent stay in hospital. 
							  
							Later in 
							the letter, David refers to Evelyn and Herbert a 
							second cousins, which is inconsistent with Herbert 
							being his nephew's son. If this is the case, Evelyn 
							and Herbert would have been first cousins, once 
							removed. However, even today, many people are 
							confused by the method of labelling degrees of 
							"cousinship", so this is not to be taken too 
							literally. 
							  
							It is 
							obvious that David is keen to introduce Evelyn to 
							Herbert and vice versa. My instinct as a single 
							Jewish man initially told me he was trying to make a 
							shidduch between the two! However, if David was born 
							c.1875, it is unlikely that Evelyn would have been a 
							similar age to Herbert, who had not long had his 
							17th birthday. On the 1930 census listing, David's 
							wife, Tillie, is aged 54. If Evelyn was even 20 at 
							the time this letter was written, that gives her a 
							birth date of c.1925, when Tillie would have been in 
							her late 40s. However, ages on censuses are 
							notoriously inaccurate, so nothing can be assumed 
							about Evelyn's age until further evidence is 
							collected. 
							  
							In 
							conclusion, this letter gives us a wonderful glimpse 
							into a father's love for his daughter and brings to 
							life the characters involved. Items such as this 
							remind us that our ancestors were more than just 
							names, dates and statistics on sheets of paper or in 
							software programs; they were real people with real 
							loves and fears, many of whom lived in a world far 
							more dangerous than the one we live in today. 
							  
							
							
							Read David's letter to his cousin Morris Kowalski of 
							10 February 1945   |